Recently, WIRED editor at large Steven Levy sat down for an interview with Palantir CEO Alex Karp. Karp defended his company’s contracts with clients like ICE and the Israeli government, which have increasingly gathered criticism. In this episode of Uncanny Valley, we dive into the most revealing parts of the interview and break down how Karp’s technostate ideology has rippled across Silicon Valley.
Articles mentioned in this episode:
Please help us improve Uncanny Valley by filling out our listener survey.
You can follow Michael Calore on Bluesky at @snackfight, Caroline Haskins on Bluesky at @carolinehaskins, and Steven Levy on Bluesky at @stevenlevy. Write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com.
How to Listen
You can always listen to this week's podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get every episode, here's how:
If you're on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or just tap this link. You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts and search for “uncanny valley.” We’re on Spotify too.
Transcript
Note: This is an automated transcript, which may contain errors.
Michael Calore: Hey, Caroline, how are you doing?
Caroline Haskins: Doing all right. Thanks. I'm filling in for Lauren today. I know she's on vacation. I do not know where, but hope she's having a nice time. How are you doing?
Michael Calore: I'm doing well. Thanks. She's leaving on a plane right now. Hopefully, given the circumstances, her plane actually took off on time.
Caroline Haskins: Yeah. I guess to be determined on how that goes.
Michael Calore: Well, we also have a special guest with us today, WIRED's editor at large, Steven Levy. Hello, Steven.
Steven Levy: Hi, Michael, and hello, Caroline. I'm delighted to be back on the show.
Michael Calore: Yes. Thanks for joining us again. We have you on this week because you recently sat down with Palantir's CEO, Alex Karp, and we're excited to hear more about it on today's show. But if you had to summarize the vibe of the conversation that you had with him, how would you summarize it?
Steven Levy: It was a little electric. He was very hyped up. We do these interviews in two parts. First, there's a camera on, and we show that segment on YouTube. Listeners can check that out, our WIRED channel on YouTube now, and then we continue talking with the cameras off. And when the cameras were on, he was very hyper and talked really fast, and it went almost like a stream of consciousness in some ways. You could see for yourself.
When the cameras went off, we still had the same kind of conversation, but it was a little less hyper, and we butted heads a little. We did it in, I'd say, not a rancorous way, but he told me afterwards. He said, "I really like the way you did this, because you were honest about it." I didn't pretend that we were on the same side politically or anything like that, and I really wasn't asking questions to try to win him over or anything, just to learn the answers to the questions that concern me and I think a lot of our readers, but I really wanted to know the answer to some of these hot-button questions about Palantir.
Michael Calore: This is WIRED's Uncanny Valley, a show about the people, power, and influence of Silicon Valley. Today, we're getting to know Alex Karp, who is best known as the CEO of Palantir Technologies. Karp's profile has become increasingly public as Palantir's contracts with partners like ICE, the CIA, and the Israeli government have come under scrutiny.
But Karp has long been known in Silicon Valley circles, particularly because of his beliefs around where the tech industry should sharpen its focus. In his book, The Technological Republic, Karp and his co-author, Nicholas Zamiska, argue that tech should work in service of a state and not for individual purposes. The company also embraces a code of conduct that supposedly binds the company to, among other things, protect privacy and civil liberties and preserve and promote democracy. Whether that's actually happening is in the eye of the beholder.
In an open letter last May, 13 former workers accused Palantir's leadership of having abandoned its founding values and in being complicit in normalizing authoritarianism under, quote, "the guise of a revolution led by oligarchs," unquote. WIRED's editor-at-large, Steven Levy, recently sat down with Karp to talk about his background, his views, and the criticism towards Palantir. We'll dive into their conversation and what Karp's answers reveal about the larger beliefs driving the tech industry today. I'm Michael Calore, director of consumer tech and culture.
Caroline Haskins: I am Caroline Haskins, staff writer.
Steven Levy: I'm Steven Levy, editor at large at WIRED.
Michael Calore: So, Steven, it's no secret that some of the tech leaders in Silicon Valley are not our biggest fans. We publish critical reporting at WIRED that often does not make them look good. And you mentioned that perhaps one of the reasons that Karp might have agreed to sit down with you is because of something that you and he have in common. You both went to the same high school in Philadelphia. Tell us about Karp's background.
Steven Levy: Sure. So as you indicated, we're both from the Philadelphia area. Somewhat different backgrounds. My parents didn't go to college, but his father was a pediatrician, Jewish American. His mother was an artist that still is an artist, and she's African American. So he is Black and Jewish parentage. He is dyslexic, and that's a big part of his identity.
And when we talked about going to Central High School, which is kind of a magnet school, it's all academic, and it draws from all over the city. We didn't go together. We're not the same age, but some teachers probably were still there who I experienced. And it was essential, he told me, that someone took an interest in him, saw he had a very high IQ, but was struggling because of his dyslexia, and encouraged him to be a little more ambitious, and he said that was kind of a turning point in his intellectual career.
So we had Central, and that helped maybe him to say yes, because we've been bugging him for a while to be one of our big interview subjects. I find him kind of fascinating. I read his book, which is surprisingly readable. And this is a guy who got a PhD in philosophy from the Goethe Institute in Germany. Right? And he studied for a while at least with Jürgen Habermas, who's sort of the Ohtani of philosophers in the world.
Michael Calore: Wow.
Steven Levy: So it was very straightforward. I didn't agree with the message he had. He was very anti-Silicon Valley and anti-some of the things I loved about Silicon Valley. He thought those are the worst things about Silicon Valley, which is, for instance, the Macintosh and its concentration on satisfying people and being fun to interact with. He thought that's a move away from building patriotic technology to help America establish its primacy throughout the world. Right?
So that's a point of contention. But the big things about Palantir, which he probably suspected, and I didn't let him down, that I was curious about was how he felt about how his products are being used by ICE, by the CIA, by the Israeli military, and, to a lesser extent, in Ukraine, where he boasts that it's been responsible for deadly force. So we talked about that and other stuff.
Michael Calore: So let's talk about those products in particular. Karp is one of the cofounders of Palantir, which was founded in the early 2000s. Peter Thiel is another cofounder. Even though the company has been around for a while, it has been gathering more attention, and it is still not completely clear to a lot of people what the company actually does.
Now, Caroline, you've reported on this before, and we spoke about it on our Palantir episode that we did with you earlier this year. But for the purposes of this conversation, can you please refresh our memory? What is Palantir, and what does it do?
Caroline Haskins: Yeah. Definitely. So I guess to start, Palantir does not refer to one product. It actually sells a number of products. The flagship ones are Foundry, which is designed for private corporations; Gotham, which is generally designed for government agencies; and then it also has the AI intelligence platform, which is a newer offering.
And I think that there is kind of a misunderstanding among the public about what these products actually do. A lot of people think that Palantir actually buys data from its customers or centralizes data from all of the different customers that pay for its services, meaning that there's just one centralized hub with everybody's information from all around the world, which would make Palantir this surveillance giant.
But I think a better way to put it is that Palantir provides infrastructure or, in some cases, surveillance infrastructure, but Palantir is not a surveillance company. It's more of an infrastructure company. Maybe an easy way to picture it would be if you were to picture kind of an old, dinosaur-type corporation that's been around for decades. They have a ton of different systems, running various operating systems, not necessarily compatible with each other, and then you have a company that's trying to make their operations more efficient.
The idea is that Palantir would sit on top of this and allow the company to get the information that it needs without actually having to go in and rewire everything in the guts of its systems from the ground up. In some ways, it's kind of like a technical band-aid. I think that's how I put it in the article.
Steven Levy: It's a plumbing company.
Caroline Haskins: Yeah.
Steven Levy: They come in and they solve the problems. And it's interesting, I looked at the evolution of the company. For a long time, they weren't profitable really. It was almost like a consulting company to begin with, because they would just send engineers embedded into the companies to solve their problems, which are about handling information, and it was kind of waiting around for AI to happen in a big way.
And when it did, they were ready, and they pounced. So it's much less like a consulting company than it used to be. It's more like a software company now, and they have products, and they still have engineers they send to support their customers to help them use the products, but it scales much better. And that's why their financial results have been so much better, because a condition to getting more contracts, it scales more effectively.
Caroline Haskins: Yeah. That definitely squares with my understanding of the company too. And I guess to get back to your conversation with Karp, I know at one point, you directly asked him about his position on how Palantir's products are being used by agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the current Trump administration.
And earlier this year, there was a contract listing showing that Palantir is getting paid $30 million, or they got $30 million paid between, I think, spring of this year, and then it ended in September 30th when the government fiscal year ended, to help the agency essentially build a new tool called ImmigrationOS that would help the agency gather information about people who are self-deporting, supposedly people doing that in real time, as well as people overstaying visas, and things of that nature. And I know you asked him about this expanding relationship and where exactly he would draw the line at democratic activity or just ethical activity. So can you tell us a bit about that?
Steven Levy: To me, that was the central question I brought to the interview. The CIA was one of his first customers. He did work for the Department of Defense, where Palantir claims that they were responsible for saving many lives by effectively identifying where IEDs, where bombs were in Afghanistan to help soldiers not get blown up by these devices.
But they had long-term contracts, I think, going back maybe even to Obama in terms of ICE, and what's happening now at ICE isn't what was happening before, whereas, as Caroline correctly points out, Palantir doesn't take the data. They help their customers make use of their data and be effective with it. And if you're helping an agency like ICE identify where to go and what happens when they get there is something that may not be legal. It may not be humane. What does Palantir do about that?
They have a very explicit code of conduct which says, "We can't violate human rights. We don't do that here, and we don't engage in discrimination." And this is a very idealistic code of conduct, and it seems to me that you can make a case, as those employees did, as Michael mentioned, that Palantir wasn't following its own code of conduct.
So I wanted to know, "What is this going to take, Alex, for you to say, 'You know what? We can no longer work with ICE. Look what they're doing'?" And his answer basically was, "I don't think they're over that line. I don't disagree with what's happening." Are you monitoring sort of what's happening with this government and democracy in this country and saying, "Maybe at some point, I have to look at—"
Alex Karp: I would say the more important question is, have I ever worked against our commercial interests because it violated our norms? Yes. Have I done this in governments? Yes. We get no credit for this, but we almost went out of business because we were not working in Russia, China, or anywhere else. So yes. Have we refused to give our product to foreign governments because we didn't agree with them? Yes. Do I agree with your implicit assertion that what's going on in immigration, as you formulated it, has never been done before? No. I think, actually, that's completely crazy.
Steven Levy: And I asked him the same line of questioning about Israel, and he talked about how Israel was a persecuted country, et cetera, and it's tough to stand up for every tiny aggression that happens with Israel, and I even said, "Well, this isn't a small thing we're talking about. Gaza, right?" But he wasn't backing down from that.
So essentially, the answer I got was, "These places I'm supporting, they haven't gone over the line." And he wasn't specific of what they would have to do for him to pull Palantir from the companies. He did say, "Look, in the past, I have gone against our business interests by refusing," this is under, I guess, the first Trump administration, "to make a Muslim database." He made a public announcement that, "We will not do that." So he used that to bolster his claim that they do follow a code of conduct.
Caroline Haskins: From reading the interview, I got the impression that he was framing his understanding of work that's ethical versus not ethical purely in terms of just nation-state alliances. He did mention the Muslim database, but that's obviously just one example. I mean, did you get the impression that he had maybe additional examples that he didn't feel comfortable talking about, or did you get the impression that his primary framework for thinking about this issue is which countries that he considers Palantir to be aligned with versus not aligned with?
Steven Levy: Yeah. Well, he had a frustrating habit of saying, "Can I go off the record here?" And I actually said to him, "This is a Q&A, Alex. It's not helpful to me if you go off the record. That's a blank spot in our transcript." So he likes to do that, to go off the record and say, "Well, here's what's really happening, Steven." But I said, "Maybe later you could tell me all this great stuff off the record, but you have to limit yourself to what you know you'll be quoted on, because there's a camera on here, and there's a digital tape recorder. So please say what you want to say and answer my question on the record."
Caroline Haskins: So one thing that happened recently is that Palantir had its earnings call. And I think sort of consistent with what you observed, Alex Karp seemed really exuberant during that earnings call. I think he said that it was the best earnings for a software company in history, but the company is doing reportedly almost $1 billion in revenue for the first time.
It's a top performer in the S&P 500. And yet, one thing that Alex Karp always insists on, at least rhetorically, is that Palantir, or at least Palantirians, employees, culturally are outsiders, underdogs, et cetera. I was wondering how you sort of saw that in the context of the interview or what you thought about the way that Alex Karp described that.
Steven Levy: Yeah. I asked him about that. It's my impression that this is something that he cultivates, the outsider mentality. And I even tied that back to our shared origins in Philadelphia quoting Jason Kelce, the Philadelphia Eagle, after they won their first Super Bowl, where he got up there and said, "Nobody likes us, and we don't care." And I thought that could be a Palantir motto.
He said, "Look, it's not fun to be so unpopular, but it's actually useful for us." So he conceded that this outsider mentality works for him, because he says, "Four out of five people, they come and they say, 'Gee, I don't want to be unpopular and work for Palantir.' But the fifth person will say, 'You know what? This is kind of interesting.'"
At one point, he said that, "I'm kind of the sacrifice." So he sees himself, even though he's a billionaire, he's got multiple homes, he lives in this 500-acre compound in rural New Hampshire, but he feels that he is an outsider. At one point, I even said to him, "Yeah. You seem to be doing pretty well, Alex."
Caroline Haskins: Mm-hmm. Safe to say.
Steven Levy: And then he said, "Well, yeah, we are doing pretty well at Palantir, and we're going to do even better. Just watch us."
Michael Calore: Yeah. Of course. Coming up after the break, we're going to dive into how Karp and Palantir's guiding beliefs are indicative of larger trends in Silicon Valley. Stay with us. Welcome back to Uncanny Valley. So, Steven, as you were telling us, throughout your interview with Alex Karp, he was not shy about expressing his political views, and that is perhaps not surprising given how we've seen Silicon Valley grow ever more embedded with politics. But some of his responses were still surprising, like when you asked him about his competitors.
Steven Levy: Yeah. He doesn't think he has competitors. Basically, he feels that what Palantir does is uniquely effective, and no one can match them for the services that they provide to its customers, whether they're government customers or corporate customers. As a matter of fact, the event I interviewed him at was some sort of developers' conference with corporate customers, and it struck me almost like the giddiness of a multilevel marketing company, like Herbalife or something like that.
The customers coming up there saying, "Palantir changed our business." And I think maybe he was conscious that that was the place they wanted me to interview him, so I could soak in the love that this self-selected group had for Palantir. But I don't think it's impossible that there could be competitors. I think with AI, one would expect competitors to Palantir, but we'll have to see. Is there anyone you consider a competitor?
Alex Karp: Our competition is actually political. The woke left and the woke right wake up every day figuring out how they can hurt Palantir. And if they get into power, they'll hurt Palantir. If they win, if the communists in France win, they will pull us out. If the Mamdani wing of the Democratic Party takes over, I view that as my party, but if that's the party, I'm not in it, or if the right woke wing, which is like, "Everything is a conspiracy. Any use of technology is actually going to only be used to eviscerate and attack us." That is actually our competition.
Caroline Haskins: Correct me if I'm wrong, Steven, but it seemed like he was responding to a very different question. It seemed like you were asking who Palantir's actual business competitors are or who was selling a product that's comparable to Foundry or Gotham, which, I mean, funny enough, when I talked to former Palantir employees, they actually had a hard time answering this question, and they pretty much all named different companies, and there wasn't a really consistent through line through that conversation. But it seemed like when Karp was answering this question, he really saw it in terms of personal grievances and/or the cultural war. How did you feel when he was saying that?
Steven Levy: Basically, it reminded me when Reed Hastings of Netflix was asked about his competition, and he says, "Sleep." The idea is that there is no one in the traditional competitive sense. He is saying that, "Our competition is our political enemies," and almost in a sense of paranoia in that. And it actually went on, that answer, and my head was spinning on it. What I said was, "Wait, how did Mamdani get in here?" It's like, "Wait a minute. I asked about competition, and you're talking about Mamdani wing of the Democratic Party."
And it's interesting that he referred to himself as a Democrat there. A lot of people would say he's gotten a lot of mileage out of claiming to be a progressive, that if you listen to a lot of what he says, maybe he's not such a progressive. And certainly, the folks he hangs out with in the Silicon Valley defense establishment may not be aligned with AOC or our mayor-elect here in New York.
Michael Calore: Also, a lot of Karp's beliefs about how technology should serve the state's interests instead of private interests has become sort of the norm in Silicon Valley. It's become a lot more of an accepted point of view. You both speak with Silicon Valley insiders all the time, and I'm just curious how this shift towards political action is seen by them, beyond the CEOs who fly to Mar-a-Lago or the White House to dine with Trump, of course.
Steven Levy: For a long time until actually quite recently, doing defense work, particularly that involved warfare, was a no-no in Silicon Valley. The Google employees stopped the contract that uses AI for the Department of Defense, and they got Google to abandon the contract. Guess who got it? Palantir. But there's a lot of companies like that, the successful companies like Anduril, a lot of defense startups, and Google has changed its policy now.
Amazon embraces defense technology. Anduril has a partnership with Meta, which is kind of wild considering that Mark Zuckerberg actually fired the founder of Anduril, Palmer Luckey, for supporting Trump. So basically, Karp told me, "Well, we've won that." And he's right. Silicon Valley now is much more in sync with defense work.
Caroline Haskins: Yeah. A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the mindset at companies like Palantir and Anduril that they have won the cultural moment and how that's exemplified by them launching merchandise stores that's designed to display pride in terms of their alignment with the military-industrial complex, and it's hard to say how long any of these cultural alignments are going to last.
I mean, the origin story of Silicon Valley is heavily tied with the military-industrial complex. Were the 2010s and earlier, was that an aberration, or are we just returning to the norm? I think it's hard to say, but I think it's also a little bit early to say that they're winning in the long term. I think it's safe to say that they think that they are.
Michael Calore: Yeah. You can find the big interview with Alex Karp on WIRED.com, and you can find the video portion of that interview on our YouTube channel. We'll be right back. Caroline, Steven, thank you both for a great conversation today. We are now diving into our new segment called WIRED/TIRED. Whatever is new and cool is WIRED, and whatever passé thing, is on its way out, is TIRED. Caroline, do you want to go first?
Caroline Haskins: OK. So I'm going to start out by saying that I'm doing the best I can to meet the criteria. This week, I read this book called Here Lies Hugh Glass, and it's not exactly a biography, but it's more an examination of the story of the guy that is essentially the basis of that movie, The Revenant, that won Leonardo DiCaprio the Oscar back in 2015.
This book gets into the fact that this was a kind of mythologized story about the West that changed and evolved according to the needs of the American audience, the ways that it played into American ideas about whiteness and masculinity and class in the early 1800s, and how that changed over the decades and even now. I mean, in 2015, you see it really leaning into these narratives about endurance and betrayal and forgiveness.
I thought the movie was great, but I think I enjoyed the book more than I liked the movie. So I'm going to put WIRED Here Lies Hugh Glass by Jon T. Coleman, and I'm going to put TIRED as The Revenant. No disrespect to Leo.
Michael Calore: I also enjoyed the movie, but I have not read the book. Steven, what's yours?
Steven Levy: So I'm also going into book land, but something more recent. Actually, two books. One is a book by Tim Wu, who is a law professor and regulator. He's worked for the Obama administration and was Biden's special advisor for competition and antitrust and science, and he's written a book called The Age of Extraction. And the other book, the companion book, is a book by a fellow named Cory Doctorow, who's been affiliated with Electronic Frontier Foundation, and his book is called Enshittification, which is a term which he coined to describe the phenomenon, which The Age of Extraction also talks about, of how big tech companies, platforms started out very useful to people.
They tilted to user value every way they could, and then they cornered the market of their specific specialty, whether it's commerce with Amazon or search with Google, and then started extracting value and made their products less useful, and locked you in more, and took more money from you and from the developers who work there.
And then I found out while talking to these authors that they had been childhood friends in Toronto. They went to the same elementary school. And Cory is a bit more woolier than Tim, who's a law professor, but they're buddies. So I thought that's kind of amazing that both of them had books out, both of which are worth reading and important, about enshittification or extraction of platforms, and what is TIRED is these platforms being enshittified. I'm sick of it.
Michael Calore: Mm-hmm. That actually ties into mine. So my TIRED is Spotify and my WIRED is Tidal, and I'm switching. So I should back up and say that I think Spotify is magic. As a person who loves music and who listens to music all day, having literally almost any song at my fingertips is magical. I can't believe that I live in an era where somebody tells me about an artist, and I can hear it within 10 seconds. It's just amazing.
And there's a lot of reasons that people don't like Spotify, and there's a lot of reasons that people have been using to quit Spotify. They don't like the small payments that the company offers to artists and labels. They don't like the politics of the cofounder of the company, Daniel Ek. He has a military AI company called Helsing. They don't want to give any money to the company that is run by this guy. There's also steady price increases that have been happening over the years.
So I'm annoyed by all those things, but the thing that really bothers me now is the new interface. So you open up Spotify now, and it's pushing me videos and podcasts and video podcasts and books, and I love podcasts. I'm talking on a podcast right now, but I'm opening Spotify because I want to hear music, and I get very few options for looking at music in the app. There's a tab for music that also has videos in it now, and I don't want any of those things.
And I know that the reason that Spotify is putting those things in is because they're trying to drive engagement and they're trying to get people hooked on other parts of their product. And to me, that is pure enshittification, and I don't want it. It's a music app. I want to open it and get music. So TIRED. No more Spotify. After years and years and years, I'm leaving. I'm going to Tidal. I've tried a few of them. Qobuz. I never know how to pronounce that.
Caroline Haskins: Qobuz?
Michael Calore: Yeah.
Caroline Haskins: I haven't heard of it.
Michael Calore: It's popular among classical and jazz nerds, really. YouTube Music is a good one. I just feel like Tidal has a superior interface. The app, the desktop, the web, they're all superior interfaces.
Steven Levy: Same library?
Michael Calore: It used to be a real problem for me, that just the songs that I wanted, like the deep cuts, were just not on Tidal. But right now, they've mostly solved that. It's about 95 to 98 percent compared to what is on the other platforms. Also, Tidal Connect, where you can just throw to a speaker from your phone. That works flawlessly. So it has almost all the songs that I want and all the features that I want and none of the crap that I don't.
Caroline Haskins: Interesting. Yeah. Fan of Tidal. I don't know if I've met one yet.
Michael Calore: I know.
Steven Levy: I thought super WIRED is vinyl. Right?
Michael Calore: That's right. Thank you for listening to Uncanny Valley. If you like what you heard today, make sure to follow our show and rate it on your podcast app of choice. If you'd like to get in touch with us with any questions, comments, or show suggestions, you can write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com. Today's show is produced by Adriana Tapia and Mark Leyda. Amar Lal at Macro Sound mixed this episode. Mark Leyda is our San Francisco studio engineer. Kate Osborn is our executive producer. Katie Drummond is WIRED's global editorial director, and Chris Bannon is Condé Nast's head of global audio.
