Yeah, I read it, back in the day
*In fact, I read this several times. It's not that they were "wrong" at RAND, more that the current terms for military jargon had not yet been invented.
*In 1993, it didn't make a lot of sense for disaffected loners to commit any big atrocities, and then for an outfit like ISIS to electronically say, "Hey yeah, that activity is all about us." Because in 1993, normal people would have naturally asked, "How did you give the orders? How did you tell your agents what to do?" But in 2016 there are so many "polycephalous, segmented networks" around that it wouldn't occur to anybody that the former norms of political causality no longer apply.
