Amazon and Barnes & Noble are duking it out over the respective battery lives of the Kindle and the new touch-screen Nook. The field of battle is the ghostly ground of press releases and promo-page blurb, and the last word seems to have been had by B&N.
After B&N laid out the specs for its new e-reader, Amazon took issue with the numbers, saying that B&N's claim rested on usage tests of just a half hour of use per day, with wireless switched off. Amazon's usage tests assume an hour of use per day, also with wireless switched off.
So what did Amazon do? It simply doubled the battery life on the product page to reflect a half-hour daily usage. Sneaky.
B&N countered with a very detailed statement, outlining the exact tests made. It also looks like the Kindle was also tested in the same way:
I love that B&N calls 150 just "two times" 56, when it could easily say "almost three times." That shows some confidence. However this works out, it's certain that both e-readers have insane battery life compared to any other kind of gadget. And if you're basing your decision on this spec alone, instead of depth of catalog and ease of use, then you're probably looking in the wrong direction.
B&N fires back at Amazon over Kindle battery life [CNET]
See Also:






