Last.fm's Wednesday launch of its Artist Royalty Program, which pays money directly to artists or labels whenever their music is played, has raised the ire of Merlin, an international rights body that represents over 12,000 independent labels. (Combined, Merlin's labels control more music than the smallest major label, EMI.)
Merlin claims Last.fm's Artist Royalty Program (ARP) doesn't pay artists retroactively for past plays and is vague as to what rights the license gives CBS/Last.fm regarding uploaded music. In addition, Merlin is upset that direct contracts between independent copyright holders and Last.fm seem to have undermined Merlin's negotiations with Last.fm to license its members' music to the service.
Indie labels who are members of Merlin could be better off waiting for negotiations to continue, since Merlin's requested terms are most likely favorable to those offered as part of Last.fm's ARP. However, for non-member labels and unsigned bands, Last.fm's ARP is a promising step forward, in terms of compensation and transparency.
Update: Last.fm has responded to Merlin's opposition to its Artist Royalty Program:
See also:

