The 1990’s were a golden age for new (and often wacky) concepts in less-lethal weapons -- from sticky foam to capture nets, acoustic blasters to rubber ball-firing claymore mines. A new paper by Neil Davison of the Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project shows how police and military scrambled to find new types of these arms, above and beyond the traditional rubber bullets and tear gas.
Development was initially chaotic with many players involved. "Many research and development activities were characterized by opportunistic and secretive endeavors at the Department of Energy’s national laboratories, in particular at Los Alamos," Davison notes. (The sticky foam they developed turned out to be a potential suffocation hazard, but is being deployed anyway, as this is not necessarily a big issue in nuclear defense.)
The period was also marked by several high-profile events where less-lethals were tried out, more or less ad hoc. Take the siege at Waco, where various attempts to drive out the Branch Davidians ended in failure:
In the end CS [tear] gas grenades were used, but these failed to get the cultists to leave the building. As a result, seventy-six people died when the compound burned down. Clearly, better less-lethals were needed.
Many of the more speculative programs ended in failure, like the efforts to develop infrasound -- super low-tones -- as a weapon: “Programme ended in 1999 due to lack of demonstrated effects,” Davison notes.
Perhaps the biggest boost for less-lethals came with operations of US Marines in Somalia in 1994:
As the reportrecounts, the melding of the many different less-lethal programs from different organizations gave rise to the Joint Nonlethal Weapons Directorate. A host of projects are currently taking place under its aegis.
Many believe that the new technologies they develop – like the Active Denial System
'pain beam' – will prove crucial in future conflicts. Experience in
Iraq suggests that the US can defeat any conventional foe easily, but has more problems in the aftermath against unconventional forces.
Less-lethals could help.
Maintaining the support of the local population is always a key principle when fighting guerrillas, and few things lose support so much as killing civilians. As Noah noted previously, up to 50 Iraqi civilians may have died because twelve years after Somalia there is still a lack of suitable laser dazzlersto stop them at checkpoints.
Davison has already covered the earlier history of nonlethals in a previous report. But it's the story of next decade which is likely to prove the most significant of all.