Have insurgents in Iraq managed to beat one of the most live-saving pieces of gear American troops can get? That's the provocative suggestion, made by Debka File. Luckily for U.S. servicemen -- and the whole American effort in Iraq -- the suggestion is almost certainly wrong, specialists in the field tell DANGER ROOM.

Since the war began, thousands and thousands of American vehicles have been equipped with radio frequency jammers, which interrupt attempts to remotely-trigger a roadside bomb. The devices aren't foolproof -- they interfere with U.S. radios, and they're useless against an explosive set off by a detonation cord. But the electronic safety bubbles the devices provide trail only behind armor, bulletproof vests, and helmets in keeping U.S. forces safe.
Or do they? *Debka *(via these guys) says that:
Not bloody likely, says one currently deployed American radio specialist. "The level of sophistication the insurgents operate at doesn't map to the electronic chess game which 'jamming a jammer' implies," he tells DANGER ROOM. Debka's writers "are either mixing up their terminology, or being intentionally vague."
Michael Puttre, the former editor of the Journal of Electronic Defense, concurs.* *Debka's "notion of disarming an anti-IED
jammer doesn't make sense. You don't disarm a jammer. And you really can't drown out a jammer by broadcasting back at it. Besides, broadcasting on the same frequency of the jammer is doing the jammer's work for it."
I used to read *Debka *all the time. I even wrote about the site, once. But after a while, there were just too many stories that melted away, on further examination. This sure seems like one of them.
UPDATE: Back in early March, the Islamic State of Iraq insurgent group released a video in which it announced the development "of a new electronic device to target US minesweepers. The device is a new
electronic circuit that cannot be defeated by current jamming techniques," says IntelCenter.